|
|
Exercise efficiency.
Measure body fat or strength to weight ratio?
Determining which is the most useful measure, body fat or
strength-to-weight ratio, may be just an issue of simplifying the
process.
While both exercise physiologists and aeronautical engineers are
concerned with efficiency issues, they approach this issue in two
distinctively different ways. A comparison of these two approaches
can be enlightening, especially for fitness enthusiasts.
The efficiency comparison
Exercise physiologists determine the efficiency of a human body
using a concept called body composition. And body composition is
calculated according to a ratio known as percentage of body fat. So,
to determine your efficiency, exercise physiologists need to know
how much you weigh (say 200 pounds), and how much of that total body
weight is made up of fat (say 50 pounds). With this information,
they'll divide the former (200) into the latter (50) and give you
your percent body fat (in this case, 25 percent). The lower your
percent body fat, the more physically efficient (and fit) you are.
In contrast, aeronautical engineers determine the efficiency of jet
airplanes and rockets using the thrust-to-weight ratio (TWR). To
determine a plane's efficiency, aeronautical engineers need to know
how much the jet plane weighs (say 100,000 pounds), and how much
thrust (like horsepower) the engines generate (say 30,000 pounds of
thrust). They'll divide the former (100,000 pounds) into the latter
(30,000 pounds) and tell you the plane's TWR (.3333 in this case).
The higher the plane's thrust-to-weight ratio, the more physically
efficient it is.
The difference between the two is that the physiologist compares a
passive element (fat) to the overall body weight of the human being
(it's effectively a fat-to-weight ratio), while the aeronautical
engineer compares an active element (pounds of thrust) to the
overall weight of the plane. And both yield efficiency ratios upon
which their respective professions depend.
|
Strength
to weight ratio.
Calculating SWR.
Home.
About Us.
FAQ's.
Timeline.
Tools.
Get Recruited
Put Your Athletic Profile online for FREE
$250 Essay
Competition.
Articles.
Clearinghouse.
College
Recruiting.
NCAA
Recruiting.
NCAA Sports
History.
Resources.
Sports History.
What do I send
to the coach.
How do I
contact the
coach.
|
| |
Interestingly enough, pilots are acutely aware of
their TWR, figure it regularly and must stay within certain
guidelines to stay airborne. In contrast, fitness enthusiasts almost
completely ignore the efficiency issue, and almost never get any
regular percentage of body fat feedback, even though change in
percentage of body fat (efficiency) is the best indicator of fitness
improvement.
The strength-to-weight ratio
But, what happens if exercise physiologists change their approach,
and measure efficiency as an aeronautical engineer does?
In human physical efficiency, the concept comparable to TWR is
called the strength-to-weight ratio (SWR).1 It compares muscle (not
fat) to a person's overall body weight. And muscle, unlike fat, is
active and easy to measure, since significant changes in muscle mass
are reflected by significant changes in strength. And, so long as
you perform some type of regular resistance training, the SWR
approach has some important advantages over the percentage of body
fat approach, including getting accurate and immediate feedback
without special equipment, technicians, added time or added money.
Also, clients can easily do it themselves.
Feedback from the SWR is also more functional and user-friendly than
the feedback from percentage of body fat. For example, SWR gives you
specific feedback on the relationship between antagonistic and
protagonistic muscles, and imbalances that may be present and may
encourage injury. It can also give you the relationship between the
upper and lower body, core muscle strength and proportionality that
can affect performance.
None of this information comes with a percent body fat reading, yet
many exercise physiologists ignore SWR. The problem is that, even
though the SWR concept has been around for more than a decade,
exercise physiologists continue to use body fat measurements to
determine fitness. |
The SWR concept, which is technically an indicator of relative
strength, may have never been tested for its ability to measure and
document changes in human physical efficiency, even though engineers
effectively use the corresponding concept every day. And, if nobody
takes the time to test it, then the field of exercise physiology may
be worse off because of it.
But, if you'd like to use the SWR, think about what you might do for
your members and clients, who can get regular feedback on changes to
their physical efficiency.
Calculating SWR
SWR is most commonly perceived as a measurement of relative
strength, or strength compared to overall body weight. So the SWR
formula for a particular exercise is strength divided by body
weight. For example, if you can bench press 250 pounds (ideally a
10-rep max), and your body weight is 200 pounds, you'd divide 250 by
200 and find that your bench press SWR is 1.25 (the higher the
better). If you calculate SWRs for several well-chosen exercises
(upper- and lower-body pushing and pulling, and core muscle
exercises), add them together, and divide the result by the number
of exercises you calculated for, you'll have a cumulative picture
known as an SWR Profile. For example, if you calculated SWRs for
five different exercises, and the results were 1.25, 0.85, 1.55,
0.70 and 0.60, you'd add them up and get 4.95. You'd then divide
4.95 by 5 (the number of exercises you calculated) and get a 0.99
SWR Profile. This is comparable to percent body fat. Since
body-weight exercise (pull-ups, push-ups, dips, sissy squats)
performance depends on relative strength/physical efficiency anyway,
they're all figured at a 1.00 SWR.
By Rick Osbourne.
Baseball I
Basketball I
Cardio Respiratory Fitness
I
College Sports
Camps I
Diet and Sport I
FAFSA-Financial Aid Application
Fitness Training I
Fencing I
Field Hockey I
Football I
Golf
I
Gym Training I
Sports Helmets I
Hockey I
Lacrosse I
Lose Weight
NAIA
Conferences I
NCAA DI Conferences
I
NCAA DII
Conferences I
NCAA DIII Conferences I
NCAA Emerging Sports
NCAA Games Rosters
I
Quit Smoking I
Rowing I
Running I
Scholarship News I
Sports Shoes I
Soccer
I
Softball I
Sports Clothing
Sports Medicine I Sports Training I
Steroids I
Swimming I
Tennis I
Volleyball I
Weight Training I
Wrestling
©
College Sports Scholarships
Contact the Webmaster
|