weight room and apparatus

weightlifting- benefits of single set against multiple sets

 

 

A recent study has shed new light on weight training techniques and has given a boost to time-conscious recreational weightlifters just the boost they need to stay with their exercise program. Resistance training (including weightlifting) is a popular and recommended form of exercise for increasing strength, improving overall health and decreasing risk of musculoskeletal injury.

Other health benefits include delaying the onset of frailty associated with aging. Resistance training involves lifting or moving a weight a certain number of times (repetitions, or reps) and should involve the major muscles of the legs, chest, back, shoulders, abdomen, and arms. Repetitions are frequently combined into sets, and multiple sets of repetitions have traditionally been used for weight training recommendations. Although ACSM and the United States Surgeon General recommend a single set of eight to 12 repetitions three or more times a week for general health/fitness, single-set reps have been generally thought of as for beginners only.

This study asked if increasing the volume of weight training with multiple sets would result in greater improvements in muscular strength, muscular endurance and body composition among long-term experienced adult recreational weight lifters. To this end, the researchers designed a protocol to compare the effects of one set of a nine-exercise circuit with those of three sets of the same circuit.

Home.
About Us.
FAQ's.
Timeline.
Tools.

Get Recruited
Put Your Athletic Profile online for FREE

$250 Essay
Competition.

Articles.
Clearinghouse.
College
Recruiting.

NCAA
Recruiting.

NCAA Sports
History.

Resources.
Sports History.

What do I send
to the coach.

How do I
contact the
coach.

 

 

Most importantly, the results show that single-set regimens remain an effective option for improving muscular fitness in long-term recreational weightlifters. This is important for those who desire the muscular fitness benefits associated with a well rounded physical fitness program but may not have the time to devote to multiple set programs.

The researchers were quick to point out that they were measuring only three factors that improve with strength training. Such other factors as disease-resistance, bone mass, and improvements in metabolism, all of which have been reported as positive results from resistance training, were not addressed. "Weight training should be an important component of any fitness regimen," said Hass. "Obviously the resistance training program should be tailored to meet each individual's goals, but a healthy lifestyle doesn't have to be dependent on a rigid high volume regimen. Our subjects showed enough improvement that the everyday exerciser should be encouraged."

The team of researchers, led by Christopher J. Hass, of the University of Florida, recruited volunteers from a local fitness center, stipulating that they be healthy recreational weightlifters with at least a year's experience. "We knew that exercise enthusiasts often drop out of their weightlifting program because it takes too much time," said Hass. "We wanted to focus on one aspect of a training regimen, and see if recreational weightlifters could get the same or similar conditioning results in a shorter time period."

Forty-nine healthy men and women between the ages of 20 and 50 years, all of whom had been performing a one-set training regimen for at least one year, were selected for the study. They were asked to maintain their current level of physical activity (recreational and cardiovascular) for the duration of the study, and were assigned to one of two training groups. Both groups did the same nine exercises: leg extension, leg curl, pullover, arm cross, chest press, lateral raise, overhead press, biceps curl, and triceps extension; one set or three sets of eight to 12 reps to momentary muscular exhaustion. After 13 weeks, the investigators measured changes in muscle strength and endurance as well as key measures of body composition in both groups.

Forty-two of the 49 subjects completed the study (including 30 women); the seven who were unable to continue for one reason or another were all from the three-set group. The results of this study supported the idea that both approaches to weight training were effective in improving muscular strength and endurance. Both groups improved in all measures taken over the 13-week period. Of note, the persons in the group assigned to do the multiple-set regimen tended to improve an average two percent more than the group assigned to the single-set regimen, but both groups showed similar improvements in body composition measures. This includes a reduction in per cent body fat and an increase in lean body mass.

The data collected supported the hypothesis that both groups would experience substantial and similar improvements in muscle strength and endurance, and body composition, and that additional sets do not significantly improve those measurements, at least not within the 13 weeks covered by this study. Although not statistically different, there was a tendency for the multiple-set group to have greater improvements in muscle endurance, lending support to a dose-response effect of weight training.

 

SCHOLARSHIP INFORMATION

Baseball I Basketball I Bowling I Cross Country I Fencing I Field Hockey I Football I Golf I Gymnastics I Ice Hockey
Lacrosse I Rowing I Skiing I Soccer I Softball I Swimming I Tennis I Track and Field
Volleyball I Water Polo I Wrestling

 

 

©  College Sports Scholarships
Contact the Webmaster