|
ncaa RECRUITING VIOLATIONS IN MEN'S BASKETBALL
The committee also found that:
In determining the appropriate penalties to impose, the committee considered the institution's self-imposed penalties, its corrective actions and the nature of the violations in this case. The penalties self-imposed by the institution are so noted. |
Home. About Us. FAQ's. Timeline. Tools. Articles.
|
|
Public reprimand and censure. 2 years of probation beginning with the announcement of the decision, July 8, 2004. (The institution had proposed a one-year period of probation.) The removal of 4 recruiting opportunities from the men's basketball program for the period beginning November 21, 2002, and concluding March 15, 2003. (Self-imposed by the university.) 2 letters of admonishment from the university's administration to the head coach, all other coaches involved in the violations, and the director of basketball operations. The institution's compliance coordinator and the men's basketball staff are required to attend an NCAA compliance seminar in 2005. Documentation of attendance at this seminar, to include all sessions relating to recruiting, shall be included in the institution's 2005 annual compliance report. |
During the probationary period, the institution shall continue to develop and implement a comprehensive educational program on NCAA legislation and submit periodic reports to the NCAA. The college also is required to submit, to the director of the NCAA Committees on Infractions, a preliminary report that sets forth a schedule for establishing this compliance and educational program. The university also must file annual compliance reports indicating progress made with the program and placing particular emphasis on adherence to NCAA recruiting legislation and the monitoring of recruiting activities in the men's basketball program. At the end of the probationary period, the university's president will provide a letter to the committee affirming that the university's current athletics policies and practices conform to all requirements of NCAA regulations.
As required by NCAA legislation for any institution involved in a major infractions case, Villanova is subject to the provisions of NCAA Bylaw 19.5.2.3, concerning repeat violators, for a 5 year period beginning on the effective date of the penalties in this case, July 8, 2004.
The members of the NCAA Division One Committee on Infractions who heard this case are: Gene A. Marsh, acting chair of the committee and professor of law, University of Alabama School of Law; Andrea L. Myers, director of athletics, Indiana State University; Josephine R. Potuto, professor of law, University of Nebraska College of Law; Richard Dunn, professor of English and chair of the English department, University of Washington; and Yvonne "Bonnie" Slatton, professor of physical education and sport science, University of Iowa.
This article is in three parts, 1 2 3 This is part 3.
Even if your coach does not give you specific goals to accomplish during each drill, you should set them for yourself. The hard work you do in practice will pay off in the game or meet.
SCHOLARSHIP INFORMATION
Baseball I
Basketball I Bowling I
Cross Country I
Fencing I Field Hockey I
Football I Golf I
Gymnastics I Ice
Hockey
Lacrosse I Rowing I
Skiing I Soccer I
Softball I Swimming
I Tennis I Track
and Field
Volleyball I Water
Polo I Wrestling
Baseball I
Basketball I
Board And Card Games I
Cardio Respiratory Fitness
I College Sports
Camps I Diet and Sport
FAFSA-Financial Aid Application I
Fitness Training I
Fencing I
Field Hockey I
Football I Golf
I Gym Training I
Sports Helmets Hockey I
Lacrosse I
Lose Weight I NAIA
Conferences I
NCAA DI Conferences
I NCAA DII
Conferences I
NCAA DIII Conferences
NCAA Emerging Sports I
NCAA Games Rosters
I
Quit Smoking I
Rowing I
Running I
Scholarship News I
Sports Shoes I Soccer Softball I
Sports Clothing I Sports Medicine I Sports Training I
Steroids I
Swimming I
Tennis I Volleyball I
Weight Training
Wrestling
|
|
© College
Sports Scholarships
Contact the Webmaster