|
|
Sensible Strength training for Preadolescents
Safe and productive youth strength-training programs
based on research results show which strength-training
protocols are best-suited for children.
A pervasive problem of
childhood obesity exists today. But the two tactics most often employed for overweight adults
-- dieting and endurance exercise -- are less likely to be effective for
children. Generally speaking, preadolescents should not follow low-calorie
diets, and they will usually not perform adult-style aerobic exercise (20 to
60 minutes of continuous treadmill running, stationary cycling, stair
climbing, etc.). If you observe children at play, you will typically see
brief periods of high-effort activity, followed by similar periods of
low-effort recovery. Like puppies, they run fast and rest, run fast and
rest. The activity best suited to childrens' exercise characteristics, and
the one that provides the greatest potential for improving their body
composition, is strength training. A basic and brief program of sensible and
supervised strength exercise is a safe and effective means for changing
overweight kids into fit kids.
Youth strength-training research
Several studies prove the efficacy of strength training for children. A
recent eight-week strength-training study was conducted with fifth-grade
students.5 After performing body composition assessments on 176 fifth
graders, 42 boys and girls with the highest percentage of body fat were
selected as research subjects. Twenty-two children were placed in the
exercise program, and 20 children served as a closely matched control group.
|
Table of
contents.
Youth
strength training research.
Youth strength training guidelines.
Home.
About Us.
FAQ's.
Timeline.
Tools.
$250
Essay
Competition.
Articles.
Clearinghouse.
College
Recruiting.
NCAA
Recruiting.
NCAA Sports
History.
Resources.
Sports History.
What do I send
to the coach.
How do I
contact the
coach.
|
|
|
The
exercisers performed about 20 minutes of free-weight strength
training and about 20 minutes of active games twice a week under
the supervision of their physical education teachers. The
strength-trained youth improved their body composition almost
twice as much as their peers (5.5 pounds vs. 2.9 pounds) (see
Table 1). These findings indicate that a brief program of
strength exercise may increase muscle development beyond that
associated with normal growth processes. A similar study
conducted with 11-year-old figure skaters using weight-stack
machines produced almost the same results, especially the gain
in lean weight following the strength-training program.6
In addition to enhanced muscle development, a year-long study with
nine-year-old girls demonstrated a 6 percent greater increase in bone
mineral density for those who performed strength exercises compared to those
who did not train.4 Contrary to the unfounded fear that strength training is
harmful to growing bones, this research suggests that sensible strength
exercise significantly enhances skeletal development in preadolescent girls.
Although it is possible for a
child to incur musculoskeletal injury while performing strength
exercise, this has never occurred in my 15 years of conducting
youth strength-training programs. Likewise, there are no reports
in the research literature of serious injuries to preadolescent
participants in supervised youth strength-training programs. For
injury prevention, adherence to sound exercise principles and
competent adult supervision are the key components of safe and
successful youth strength-training experiences.
|
In 1993, a youth strength-training study was completed that
produced an unprecedented 74-percent increase in overall muscle
strength in 10-year-old children.1 The exercisers developed
almost six times as much strength as the control subjects during
the two-month training period (see Table 2).
The exercise protocol in this study was the DeLorme-Watkins
system, consisting of three progressively heavier training sets
with 10 to 15 repetitions each. The first set used 50 percent of
the child's 10-repetition maximum (10 RM) weight-load for 10
repetitions, and served as a first level warm-up. The second set
used 75 percent of the child's 10 RM weight-load for 10
repetitions, and served as a second level warm-up. The third set
was performed with the child's 10 RM weigh-toad for as many
repetitions as possible. When the child completed 15 repetitions
with this weight-load, the resistance was increased by 5 to 10
percent.
Another strength-training program used the Berger system.2 This
exercise protocol required three sets with the child's
six-repetition maximum (6 RM) weight-load. After two months of
training, the 10-year-old boys and girls increased their upper-
and lower-body strength by an average of 47 percent. While this
was a significant gain, it was considerably less than that
attained with the DeLorme-Watkins program. Based on these two
studies, two warm-up sets followed by one hard exercise set with
a moderate weight-load (10 to 15 repetitions to fatigue) may be
more effective for building strength in preadolescents than
three hard exercise sets with a heavy weight-load (6 repetitions
to fatigue).
A third study eliminated the sets variable, and strictly
examined the effects of resistance/repetitions on youth strength
development.3 This time, one set of six to eight repetitions using a
relatively heavy weight-load was compared to one set of 13 to 15 repetitions
using a moderate weight-load. The children who performed 13 to 15 repetitions
made significantly greater increases in muscle strength and muscle endurance
than those who performed six to eight repetitions (see Table 3).
These results indicate that preadolescents, unlike adults, may respond
better to strength-training protocols that use more repetitions with
moderate resistance than those that use fewer repetitions with heavy
resistance. This may be related to the neuromuscular component of strength
development in untrained children, with more exercise repetitions eliciting
more motor learning. Of course, the risk of injury is further reduced by
training with moderate weight-loads, making this exercise protocol doubly
beneficial.
This training program (one set of 13 to 15 repetitions) was used with female
figure skaters between eight and 13 years of age.6 Because these young
athletes skated several days a week, their strength training was limited to
10 exercises, one or two days per week. The one- and two-day-per-week
exercisers attained such similar results that the data was combined. After
10 weeks of training, the 26 skaters (mean age 10.5 years) increased their
upper-body strength by 40 percent, their joint flexibility by 6 percent and
their jumping performance by 11 percent. All of the participants expressed
personal satisfaction with the strength-training program, and their skating
coaches reported improved athletic ability on the ice.
These findings indicate that a basic and brief strength-training program is
effective for improving selected fitness parameters and performance factors
in female figure skaters. It also appears that a single weekly exercise
session is sufficient for attaining significant strength development in
young athletes who are concurrently participating in sports training and
competition.
Youth strength-training guidelines
Based on the research findings, following are recommendations for safe and
productive youth strength-training programs:
1. Select basic exercises for the major muscle groups. This could be as few
as four multiple-muscle exercises, such as leg presses, chest presses,
pull-downs and shoulder presses. The program could also consist of as many
as 12 single-muscle exercises, such as leg extensions, leg curls, hip
adductions, hip abductions, chest crosses, back pullovers, lateral raises,
bicep curls, tricep extensions, abdominal curls, low back extensions and
calf raises.
2. Have the youth perform approximately 12 exercise sets per training
session. For example, three sets each of a four-exercise program, two sets
each of a six-exercise program or one set each of a 12-exercise program.
3. Have children use a resistance that permits between 10 and 15 properly
performed repetitions to muscle fatigue.
4. Increase the weight-load by 1 to 3 pounds whenever 15 repetitions can be
completed in good form.
5. Make sure young people perform every repetition through a full range of
joint movement, from a position of comfortable muscle stretch to a position
of complete muscle contraction.
6. Have them perform every repetition with controlled movement speed, taking
approximately two seconds for each lifting action, and two to three seconds
for each lowering action.
7. Train youth two or three non-consecutive days per week. For children
actively involved in sports, a single weekly training session should be
sufficient.
8. Progress gradually and consistently. This can be facilitated by recording
every training session on simplified workout cards.
9. Include aerobic activity and flexibility exercises in every training
session, using group games whenever possible to enhance student involvement
and enjoyment.
10. Provide competent instruction and supervision by qualified adults
throughout every exercise class. For best results, try not to exceed a ratio
of five children to one adult instructor.
Contrary to the fear that strength training is harmful to growing bones,
research suggests that strength exercise enhances skeletal development.
Table 1. Changes in body composition for exercisers and control subjects
over eight-week assessment period (42 subjects, mean age 11 years).
|
Group Percent
Fat |
Lean Weight |
Fat Weight |
Body Composition |
| Exercise |
-2.7%* |
+2.5 lbs* |
-3.0 lbs* |
5.5 lbs |
| (N=22) |
| Control |
-1.9%* |
+1.5 lbs |
-1.4 lbs* |
2.9 lbs |
| (N=20) |
*Significant change (p<0.05)
Table 2. Changes in muscle strength for exercise and
control subjects after eight weeks of strength exercise (23 subjects, mean
age 10 years). Exercise Group (N = 14) Control Group (N = 9)
|
10 RM Strength in kilograms |
Pre |
Post |
%
Change |
Pre |
Post |
% Change |
| Leg Extension |
12.9 |
21.2 |
64.5* |
12.1 |
13.8 |
14.1 |
| Leg Curl |
10.4 |
18.5 |
77.6* |
12.0 |
13.6 |
13.2 |
| Chess Press |
15.2 |
25.0 |
64.1* |
13.4 |
15.0 |
12.5 |
| Overhead Press |
7.5 |
14.1 |
87.0* |
7.8 |
8.8 |
13.1 |
| Bicep Curl |
4.7 |
8.3 |
78.1* |
4.8 |
5.3 |
12.2 |
| Mean % Change |
|
|
74.3 |
|
|
13.0 |
*Significant two-way interaction (p<0.05)
Table 3. Effects of an eight-week youth strength-training program using
higher repetitions and lower weightloads vs. using lower repetitions and
higher weight-loads (43 subjects mean age 8 years).
| Variable |
Control group (no training) |
Low rep group (6-8 reps) |
High rep group (13-15 reps) |
| Leg Extension Strength |
+13.6% |
+31.0% |
+40.9% |
| Chest Press Strength |
+ 4.2% |
+ 5.3% |
+16.3%* |
| Leg Extension Endurance |
+ 3.7 reps |
+ 8.7 reps |
+13.1 reps* |
| Chest Press Endurance |
+ 1.7 reps |
+ 3.1 reps |
+ 5.2 reps |
*Significantly different from low rep group (p<0.05)
REFERENCES
1. Faigenbaum, A., L. Zaichkowski, W. Westcott, L. Micheli and A. Fehlandt.
The effects of twice-a-week strength training program on children. Pediatric
Exercise Science 5: 339-346, 1993.
2. Faigenbaum, A., W. Westcott, L. Micheli, A. Outerbridge, C. Long, R.
LaRosa Loud and L. Zaichkowsky. The effects of strength training and
detraining on children. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 10(2):
109-114, 1996.
3. Faigenbaum, A., W. Westcott, R. LaRosa Loud and C. Long. The effects of
different resistance training protocols on muscular strength and endurance
development in children. Pediatrics 104(1): 1-7, 1999.
4. Morris, F., G. Naughton, J. Gibbs, et al. Prospective ten-month exercise
intervention in premenarchael girls: Positive effects on bone and lean mass.
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 12(9): 1453-1462, 1997.
5. Westcott, W., J. Tolken and B. Wessner. School-based conditioning
programs for physically unfit children. Strength and Conditioning 17: 5-9,
1995.
6. Westcott, W., and S. Ramsden. Specialized Strength Training. Exercise
Science Publishers: Monterey, Calif., 2001.
Wayne L. Westcott, Ph.D., is fitness research advisor at the South Shore
YMCA in Quincy, Mass., and author of 21 books on strength training.
Baseball I
Basketball I
Bowling I
Football I
Golf I
Ice Hockey I
Lacrosse I
Track & Field I
Soccer I
Swimming & Diving I
Softball
I
Tennis
Volleyball I
Wrestling
©
College Sports Scholarships
Strength
training is all about increasing muscle strength. To do this a
muscle must be "loaded" with some type of resistance. It matters
little whether the resistance is applied to a muscle via machines,
barbells, dumbbells, stretch cords, sandbags, bricks or even other human
beings.
|