|
|
oxygen consumption is a good guide to your physical fitness
measuring oxygen consumption
By Matt Brzycki,
Assistant Director of Campus Recreation, Fitness
Princeton University.
Reference:
A Practical Approach to Strength Training, 3rd edition. By Matt Brzycki.
Oxygen consumption is considered the
best indicator of a person's level of
aerobic fitness. Like virtually all
of a person's other physiological characteristics, potential for
aerobic fitness is greatly influenced by genetics. Oxygen
consumption is also affected by age, gender and body size.
There are a number of ways to accurately measure
oxygen consumption in a laboratory. The most widely used method is
the motor-driven treadmill. Other methods are stepping up and down
on a bench of standard height at a fixed rate, or pedaling a bicycle
ergometer (a device that measures work) in an upright or a recumbent
position using the legs and/or arms. Each of these methods makes it
possible to exercise at different levels of intensity while
maintaining a relatively stable position. This allows for
measurement of various physiological responses, including the amount
of expired air, heart rate, blood pressure and body temperature --
all of which can help determine the amount of oxygen being consumed.
Laboratory testing is an excellent means of providing accurate and
valid data. For the average person, however, such tests can be
expensive, time-consuming and impractical. A much more practical way
to assess oxygen consumption without the drawbacks of laboratory
testing is field testing performed outside the laboratory. Certain
field tests have a high correlation to laboratory test results.
One of the most popular field tests used to determine oxygen
consumption is the 1.5-mile running test. (A 1-mile running test is
more suitable for adolescents and the elderly.) The primary
objective of this test is to run 1.5 miles in the least amount of
time. For this field test to be as accurate as possible, distance
must be precise and running must take place on a level surface.
Running on an indoor or outdoor track is preferred. While the
results of the 1.5-mile running test are an excellent predictor of
oxygen consumption,3 it's important to realize that this test favors
runners. |
Home.
About Us.
FAQ's.
Timeline.
Tools.
Get Recruited
Put Your Athletic Profile online for FREE
$250
Essay
Competition.
Articles.
Clearinghouse.
College
Recruiting.
NCAA
Recruiting.
NCAA Sports
History.
Resources.
Sports History.
What do I send
to the coach.
How do I
contact the
coach.
|
|
|
Table 1 lists predicted values of
oxygen consumption based on the time it takes to run 1.5 miles.
Various running times are given in five-second intervals between
eight minutes and 15 minutes 55 seconds. These values are an
absolute measure of how much oxygen is consumed in milliliters
per kilogram of bodyweight per minute (or ml/kg/min). Table 2
shows norms for oxygen consumption in absolute terms based on
age and gender.2,6
Oxygen consumption: Absolute
Let's suppose that a 35-year-old man ran 1.5 miles in 12 minutes
30 seconds. Using Table 1, his oxygen consumption for this
particular running time is 42.12 ml/kg/min, or simply 42.12. In
other words, he consumed about 42.12 milliliters of oxygen for
every kilogram that he weighed during each minute of his
1.5-mile run. Referring to Table 2 (under 30- to 39-year-old
males), note that this value (42.12) falls between the range of
40 and 47. This indicates that his level of aerobic fitness
would be considered average. (Elite male endurance athletes such
as cross-country runners and skiers have recorded oxygen
consumption values as high as the upper 70s and low 80s.)
Table 1 is only valid for determining oxygen consumption when
running 1.5 miles between 8 minutes and 15 minutes 55 seconds.
The American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) offers the
following formula to determine oxygen consumption for running
speeds of at least 5 mph [134 meters per minute (m/min)] on a
level surface:
oxygen consumption = (speed in m/min) x
(0.2 ml/kg/min per m/min) + 3.5 ml/kg/min |
Using this formula, oxygen consumption can be
estimated for a run of any known distance and duration.1 As an
example, you can estimate the oxygen consumption for Haile
Gebrselassie of Ethopia when he ran 10,000 meters in a world-record
time of 26:31.32 in 1997. First, convert his running time (26:31.32)
to its decimal equivalent. In this case, the decimal equivalent of
26:31.32 is 26.522 (31.32 seconds divided by 60 sec/min is 0.522 +
26 min = 26.522). His running speed was approximately 377.05 m/min
(10,000 m divided by 26.522 min). Next, multiply his speed (377.05
m/min) by the oxygen cost of horizontal running (0.2 ml/kg/min per
m/min) and add the oxygen cost at rest (3.5 ml/kg/min). This
calculation yields a value of 78.91 ml/kg/min (377.05 m/min x 0.2
ml/kg/min per m/min + 3.5 ml/kg/min = 78.91 ml/kg/min).
A similar formula is used to determine oxygen consumption for
walking speeds between 1.9 and 3.7 mph.1 At lower speeds, walking is
generally a more efficient process than running. In fact, the oxygen
cost of horizontal walking at a given speed is about one-half that
for running. Therefore, the only difference in the previously
mentioned formula is that the walking speed is multiplied by 0.1
ml/kg/min per m/min (the oxygen cost of horizontal walking) and then
added to 3.5 ml/kg/min (the oxygen cost at rest). So, a person who
walked 2,700 meters in 30 minutes would have an oxygen consumption
of 12.5 ml/kg/min (90 m/min x 0.1 ml/kg/min per m/min + 3.5
ml/kg/min = 12.5 ml/kg/min). (Note: To convert mph to m/min,
multiply the mph by 26.8; to convert miles to meters, multiply the
number of miles by 1,609.)
Oxygen consumption: Relative
Oxygen consumption can also be expressed in relative terms of liters
per minute (L/min). Determining oxygen consumption in relative terms
is usually a better indicator of aerobic fitness because the value
takes into account differences in bodyweight. For instance, if two
people ran the same distance in the same time, they would consume
the same amount of oxygen per unit of bodyweight in absolute terms.
In relative terms, however, a larger individual would actually
consume more oxygen than a smaller individual because a greater body
mass was displaced over a given distance.
To determine oxygen consumption in L/min, bodyweight must
first be converted to kilograms (kg). To do this, divide bodyweight in
pounds by 2.2. Suppose that the 35-year-old male in the earlier example
weighed 198 pounds. His bodyweight would be equal to 90 kilograms (198 lb
divided by 2.2 lb/kg = 90 kg). Next, multiply his bodyweight (in kilograms)
by his oxygen consumption (in ml/kg/min) and divide by 1,000 (to convert to
liters). His bodyweight (90 kg) multiplied by his oxygen consumption (42.12
ml/kg/min) is 3,790.8 ml/min. To divide by 1,000, simply move the decimal
point three places to the left. This means that a 198-pound individual who
ran 1.5 miles in 12:30 would consume about 3.79 liters of oxygen during
every minute of his run.
Table 3 lists norms for oxygen consumption in relative terms based on age,
gender and bodyweight.2,6 Referring to this table (again under 30- to
39-year-old males), you'll find that this value (3.79 L/min) is considered
to be a high level of fitness for males of his age relative to his
bodyweight. Recall that when his bodyweight wasn't considered, his level of
aerobic fitness was considered "average." As such, oxygen consumption gives
a truer indication of fitness level when it is expressed relative to
bodyweight. (Values of more than 5 or 6 L/min are fairly common in highly
fit individuals.)
Expected oxygen consumption According to the ACSM, the following regression
equations can be used to predict the expected oxygen consumption of an
individual based upon activity level, age and gender:
Active men: 69.7 (0.612 x age)
Active women: 42.9 (0.312 x age)
Sedentary men: 57.8 (0.445 x age)
Sedentary women: 42.3 (0.356 x age)
For example, a sedentary 40-year-old woman would be expected to have an
oxygen consumption of about 28.06 ml/kg/min (42.3 minus the value of 0.356 x
40). Comparing the expected oxygen consumption to the actual oxygen
consumption is helpful in determining whether a person has any functional
aerobic impairment (FAI). The FAI may be found by subtracting the actual
oxygen consumption from the expected oxygen consumption. This value is
divided by the expected oxygen consumption and then multiplied by 100 (to
convert to a percentage). If the 40-year-old woman in this example was found
to have an actual oxygen consumption of 22.45 ml/kg/min, she would have an
FAI of about 20 percent (the expected oxygen consumption of 28.06 ml/kg/min
minus the actual oxygen consumption of 22.45 ml/kg/min divided by the
expected oxygen consumption of 28.06 ml/kg/min times 100 equals 19.99
percent). A negative percentage indicates that the person's actual oxygen
consumption is better than expected. Again, it should be noted that heredity
plays an important role in determining a person's level of aerobic fitness.
Estimating caloric expenditure
The caloric equivalent of one liter of oxygen ranges from 4.7 calories when
fats are used as the sole source of energy to 5 calories when carbohydrates
are used as the only source of energy. (The caloric equivalent of one liter
of oxygen is 4.4 calories when proteins are used as the single source of
energy. Under most circumstances, however, protein utilization during
exercise is negligible in terms of energy production and is usually
disregarded.) For all practical purposes -- with little loss in precision --
a person uses about 5 calories for every liter of oxygen that is consumed.5
To determine the rate of caloric expenditure, simply take the oxygen
consumption value in L/min and multiply it by 5 calories per liter (cal/L).
Recall the earlier example of the 198-pound male whose oxygen consumption
was 3.79 L/min. In this case, his rate of caloric expenditure would be
almost 19 calories per minute (3.79 L/min x 5 cal/L = 18.95 cal/min).
To determine the total number of calories that were used during the run,
multiply the rate of caloric expenditure (in cal/min) by the running time.
In this case, multiplying 18.95 cal/min by 12.5 minutes (12:30 in decimal
form) indicates that he used about 237 calories during his run (18.95
cal/min x 12.5 min = 237 cal).
| Table 1 |
|
Predicted Values of Oxygen Consumption |
| |
Based on the Time to Complete a 1.5-Mile Run |
| Time |
|
Value* |
Time |
Value |
Time |
Value |
Time |
Value |
| 8:00 |
63.84 |
10:00 |
51.77 |
12:00 |
43.73 |
14:00 |
37.98 |
| 8:05 |
63.22 |
10:05 |
51.37 |
12:05 |
43.45 |
14:05 |
37.77 |
| 8:10 |
62.21 |
10:10 |
50.98 |
12:10 |
43.17 |
14:10 |
37.57 |
| 8:15 |
62.01 |
10:15 |
50.59 |
12:15 |
42.90 |
14:15 |
37.37 |
| 8:20 |
61.42 |
10:20 |
50.21 |
12:20 |
42.64 |
14:20 |
37.18 |
| 8:25 |
60.85 |
10:25 |
49.84 |
12:25 |
42.38 |
14:25 |
36.98 |
| 8:30 |
60.29 |
10:30 |
49.47 |
12:30 |
42.12 |
14:30 |
36.79 |
| 8:35 |
59.74 |
10:35 |
49.11 |
12:35 |
41.86 |
14:35 |
36.60 |
| 8:40 |
59.20 |
10:40 |
48.75 |
12:40 |
41.61 |
14:40 |
36.41 |
| 8:45 |
58.67 |
10:45 |
48.40 |
12:45 |
41.36 |
14:45 |
36.23 |
| 8:50 |
58.15 |
10:50 |
48.06 |
12:50 |
41.11 |
14:50 |
36.04 |
| 8:55 |
57.63 |
10:55 |
47.72 |
12:55 |
40.87 |
14:55 |
35.86 |
| 9:00 |
57.13 |
11:00 |
47.38 |
13:00 |
40.63 |
15:00 |
35.68 |
| 9:05 |
56.64 |
11:05 |
47.05 |
13:05 |
40.39 |
15:05 |
35.50 |
| 9:10 |
56.16 |
11:10 |
46.73 |
13:10 |
40.16 |
15:10 |
35.33 |
| 9:15 |
55.68 |
11:15 |
46.41 |
13:15 |
39.93 |
15:15 |
35.15 |
| 9:20 |
55.21 |
11:20 |
46.09 |
13:20 |
39.70 |
15:20 |
34.98 |
| 9:25 |
54.76 |
11:25 |
45.78 |
13:25 |
39.48 |
15:25 |
34.81 |
| 9:30 |
54.31 |
11:30 |
45.47 |
13:30 |
39.26 |
15:30 |
34.64 |
| 9:35 |
53.87 |
11:35 |
45.17 |
13:35 |
39.04 |
15:35 |
34.48 |
| 9:40 |
53.43 |
11:40 |
44.87 |
13:40 |
38.82 |
15:40 |
34.31 |
| 9:45 |
53.01 |
11:45 |
44.58 |
13:45 |
38.61 |
15:45 |
34.15 |
| 9:50 |
52.59 |
11:50 |
44.29 |
13:50 |
38.39 |
15:50 |
33.99 |
| 9:55 |
52.18 |
11:55 |
44.01 |
13:55 |
38.19 |
15:55 |
33.83 |
| * ml/kg/min |
| Table 2 |
Norms for Oxygen Consumption in |
|
| |
|
Absolute Terms (ml/kg/min)* |
|
| Women |
| Age |
|
Low |
Fair |
Average |
Good |
High |
| 20 29 |
|
<28 |
29 34 |
35 43 |
44 48 |
49+ |
| 30 39 |
|
<27 |
28 33 |
34 41 |
42 47 |
48+ |
| 40 49 |
|
<25 |
26 31 |
32 40 |
41 45 |
46+ |
| 50 65 |
|
<21 |
22 28 |
29 36 |
37 41 |
42+ |
| Men |
| Age |
|
Low |
Fair |
Average |
Good |
High |
| 20 29 |
|
<38 |
39 43 |
44 51 |
52 56 |
57+ |
| 30 39 |
|
<34 |
35 39 |
40 47 |
48 51 |
52+ |
| 40 49 |
|
<30 |
31 35 |
36 43 |
44 47 |
48+ |
| 50 59 |
|
<25 |
26 31 |
32 39 |
40 43 |
44+ |
| 60 69 |
|
<21 |
22 26 |
27 35 |
36 39 |
40+ |
| * From Astrand, 1960, and Vanderburgh &
Considine, 1995. |
| Table 3 |
Norms for Oxygen Consumption in |
|
| |
|
|
Relative Terms (L/min)* |
|
| Women |
| Age |
|
Low |
|
Fair |
Average |
Good |
High |
| 20 29 |
|
<1.69 |
|
1.70 1.99 |
2.00 2.49 |
2.50 2.79 |
2.80+ |
| 30 39 |
|
<1.59 |
|
1.60 1.89 |
1.90 2.39 |
2.40 2.69 |
2.70+ |
| 40 49 |
|
<1.49 |
|
1.50 1.79 |
1.80 2.29 |
2.30 2.59 |
2.60+ |
| 50 65 |
|
<1.29 |
|
1.30 1.59 |
1.60 2.09 |
2.10 2.39 |
2.40+ |
| Men |
| Age |
|
Low |
|
Fair |
Average |
Good |
High |
| 20 29 |
|
<2.79 |
|
2.80 3.09 |
3.10 3.69 |
3.70 3.99 |
4.00+ |
| 30 39 |
|
<2.49 |
|
2.50 2.79 |
2.80 3.39 |
3.40 3.69 |
3.70+ |
| 40 49 |
|
<2.19 |
|
2.20 2.49 |
2.50 3.09 |
3.10 3.39 |
3.40+ |
| 50 59 |
|
<1.89 |
|
1.90 2.19 |
2.20 2.79 |
2.80 3.09 |
3.10+ |
| 60 69 |
|
<1.59 |
|
1.60 1.89 |
1.90 2.49 |
2.50 2.79 |
2.80+ |
| * From Astrand, 1960, and Vanderburgh &
Considine, 1995. |
Baseball I
Basketball I
Bowling I
Cross Country I
Fencing I
Field Hockey I
Football I
Golf I
Gymnastics I
Ice Hockey
Lacrosse I
Rowing I
Skiing I
Soccer I
Softball I
Swimming
I
Tennis I
Track and Field
Volleyball I
Water Polo I
Wrestling
©
College Sports Scholarships
Contact the Webmaster
Many people make time for exercise
because it's fun and they appreciate the psychological benefits of
exercise. Exercise reduces feelings of stress and makes them feel
good.
|