|
|
weight training. free weights or
machines?
While some people will have a bias
toward free weights or machines, the judicious use of both will probably
maximize exercise benefits.
The two most popular types of
equipment for weight training are free weights (barbells and dumbbells)
and machines (either selectorized or plate-loaded). Yet while today's
equipment has come a long way from the Indian clubs and kettlebells that
were in vogue until the turn of the century, there is still debate about
what type of strength equipment is the best to use.
Weight history 101
In 1902, the Milo Barbell Company manufactured the first adjustable,
plate-loaded barbell in the United States. The plate-loaded barbell --
patterned after the Berg-Hantel barbell from Germany -- was a tremendous
breakthrough in weight training. For the first time, a barbell could be
loaded in a relatively short time with the desired amount of weight.
Previously, a different barbell was needed for each different weight.
For the next half century, the barbell was arguably the single most
popular and productive tool for weight training. In the '40s and '50s, a
number of body builders made plate-loaded machines of bars, pipes,
pulleys and cables to do away with the most awkward free-weight
positions, and some of them marketed the devices to the public. Looking
to "build a better barbell," Arthur Jones designed and built the first
Nautilus machine in 1948 -- a prototype pullover model -- in Tulsa,
Okla. (although he did not begin selling and delivering his machines
until late 1970). In 1957, the original Universal Gym Company developed
the first multi-station selectorized weight-training machine. Invented
by Harold Zinkin, this revolutionary machine featured several exercise
stations with separate "stacks" of flat weight plates that traveled up
and down solid steel guide-rods. Adjustments in weight could be made
quickly and easily through the use of a selector pin.
The so-called "fitness boom" of the 1970s served as a springboard for
the emergence of exercise machinery and its subsequent popularity as a
training modality. Arriving almost simultaneously with the acceptance of
machines was a fiery and emotional debate over which of the two
modalities (free weights or machines) was better for weight training. |
Home.
About Us.
FAQ's.
Timeline.
Tools.
$250 Essay
Competition.
Articles.
Clearinghouse.
College
Recruiting.
NCAA
Recruiting.
NCAA Sports
History.
Resources.
Sports History.
What do I send
to the coach.
How do I
contact the
coach.
|
| |
Issues and answers
Why the squabble? Much of the debate centers on muscular response and
athletic specificity.
Muscular response. It is said that free weights are more advantageous for
building muscular size and strength, while machines are merely for toning
and shaping muscles. But is this a reasonable assertion?
To examine this matter, it's first necessary to understand the requirements
for increasing the size and strength of muscles. First, a resistance (or
"load") must be applied to a muscle. Second, the resistance must be made
progressively more challenging from one workout to the next. It's that
simple. Certainly, other ingredients are also important in weight training,
but to improve muscular size and strength, these are the two basic
requirements.
What about the nature of the resistance? A number of studies show that
muscle development occurs the same way, whether using free weights or
machines. A 10-week study compared groups training three times per week with
either free weights or machines.5 Both groups significantly increased
strength and lean body mass and deceased body fat. There were no significant
differences between the groups. Similar results were found in another
10-week study examining a group using machines and a group using free
weights.4 |
The bottom line is that muscles cannot possibly "know"
whether the source of the resistance is a barbell, a dumbbell, a
selectorized machine, a plate-loaded machine or a cinder block. The sole
factors in determining muscular response from weight training are genetic
makeup and level of intensity -- not the equipment used.
Athletic specificity. The second area of controversy generally pertains to
specificity. Some individuals feel that specific sports skills can be
improved by simulating them with added resistance. Unfortunately, the
motor-learning literature does not seem to support this assertion. In one
study, competitive swimmers were filmed while sprinting the butterfly.3 The
films were digitized and analyzed by computer. Among other things, it was
found that swimming using resistance was done with noticeably different --
and less effective -- stroke mechanics compared to swimming without added
resistance. In effect, the swimmers were performing different strokes.
The same result occurs when attempting to mimic the movement pattern of a
particular sports skill in the weight room with a barbell or dumbbell. No
exercise done in the weight room -- with a barbell, dumbbell or machine --
will help improve specific sports skills. At best, this is a waste of time
and energy.
Another related argument is that balancing a barbell or a dumbbell is
advantageous because this balance will carry over to sports skills. Once
again, the relevant research does not appear to confirm this claim. In one
study, six tests of dynamic and static balance were examined, and it was
found that the abilities supporting one test of balance were separate from
those supporting another.1 In other words, the ability to balance a barbell
is quite different from the ability to balance the body during a handstand
or any other skill requiring balance. Adds John Thomas, the strength and
conditioning coach at Penn State, "[Using] free weights may develop general
balance, but not specific sport skills."
While watching a basketball game, volleyball match or any other athletic
event, try to figure out which teams use free weights, which use machines,
which use a combination and which use nothing at all. Obviously, it would be
impossible to tell since the source of resistance matters very little, if
any, in a person's response to weight training.
Pros and cons
There are a number of pros and cons to both free weights and machines that
may have an impact on your choice of equipment.
Advantages of free weights. Free weights have the following advantages over
machines:
1. With a limited or tight budget, the most important consideration in the
choice of equipment may be cost, since machines are generally much more
expensive than free weights. A complete line of state-of-the-art
selectorized equipment (10 to 12 machines) could easily cost more than
$40,000. That same number of plate-loaded machines would be much less
expensive, but remember a possible "hidden" cost: A few thousand pounds of
plates may need to be purchased.
2. Most machines designed for commercial use perform only one or two
functions. A bicep-curl machine, for example, can only be used to exercise
the biceps. In comparison, a bar and a few hundred pounds of plates can be
used for just about every muscle in the body. So, free weights give more
variety per dollar.
3. It's safe to say that when it comes to free weights, "one size fits all."
Indeed, free weights can accommodate just about everyone, regardless of
their size. On the other hand, those who are at an extreme in terms of
height and/or limb length may not be able to fit properly on some machines.
For this reason, machines present a major drawback for many adolescents who
wish to strength train.
4. Balancing free weights requires a greater involvement of synergistic
muscles. However, Ken Mannie, the strength and conditioning coach at
Michigan State, points out that, "the rate and level at which [the
synergistic muscles] act merit additional study."
Advantages of machines. Machines have the following advantages over free
weights:
1. Some exercises can be performed efficiently only with machines, including
hip abduction, adduction and flexion, leg curls, leg extensions, lat
pulldowns and neck exercises.
2. Most machines can provide variable resistance. As an exercise is
performed, the biomechanical leverage of the skeletal system changes, making
the movement feel easier in some positions and harder in others. A properly
designed machine automatically varies the resistance to match the changes in
biomechanical leverage. In positions of inferior leverage (and inferior
strength), the machine creates a mechanical advantage and a lower level of
resistance; as the skeletal system moves into a position of superior
leverage (and superior strength), the machine creates a mechanical
disadvantage and a higher level of resistance. The end result is greater
muscular effort throughout the range of motion (ROM). During a typical
free-weight exercise, there is adequate resistance for muscles in their
weakest positions, but not enough in their strongest positions. Because of
this, the amount of resistance that can be used is limited to that which can
be handled in the position of least leverage. There are, however, a few free
weight exercises that provide somewhat adequate resistance throughout most
of the movement, including wrist flexion/extensions, shoulder shrugs and
calf raises.
3. People are required to balance the resistance when using free weights.
Having to do this can be viewed as a drawback. Some people -- particularly
beginners -- might worry more about balancing the weight than about
performing the movement properly. Furthermore, people are likely to spend
excessive energy in balancing the weight. With most machines, the weight is
already balanced so that a person will be able to concentrate on the proper
performance of the exercise. By not involving synergistic muscles to balance
the weight, machines can also work the target muscles to a greater degree.
4. Most people don't have an abundance of free time to spend in the weight
room. Workouts are generally more time-efficient when machines are used. The
resistance on machines can be set by simply moving a selector pin rather
than by fiddling around changing plates.
5. In general, machines provide direct resistance over a greater range of
motion (ROM) compared to a similar free-weight exercise. A machine pullover,
for example, can provide direct resistance over as much as 270 degrees ROM
around the shoulder joint. By comparison, a barbell or dumbbell pullover
provides only about 100 degrees of direct resistance for the same
musculature (the latissimus dorsi). Therefore, a pullover done on a machine
is much more efficient than a pullover done with free weights since the
targeted muscles are exercised over a greater ROM. This holds true for just
about all machine exercises compared to their free-weight counterparts.
6. Many free-weight exercises do not provide the targeted muscles with an
adequate stretch. For instance, a barbell bench-press restricts the
stretching of the chest muscles -- a person could stretch them further but
is unable to do so because the bar must stop at the chest. Almost all
machine-type bench presses have movement arms with an opening for the chest.
This enables a greater stretch so that flexibility isn't compromised. It
should be noted that performing free-weight exercises with dumbbells can
allow a better stretch than with a barbell.
7. Machines are more practical than free weights during rehabilitation. With
a left-knee injury, many free-weight exercises would be quite difficult or
uncomfortable (if not impossible) to perform. However, the entire upper
torso, right leg and possibly even both hips could still be trained using
machines. A person could even continue to exercise on most machines with an
arm or leg in a cast. For instance, if the wrist were in a cast and a person
could not grasp a barbell or dumbbell, many upper-body exercises on
machines, including the "pec dec," pullover and lateral raise, could still
be performed.
8. Any barbell exercise that involves lifting a weight over the head -- such
as a bench press or a seated press --should only be performed with a
spotter. With machines, a spotter is rarely needed, since it's virtually
impossible to get pinned underneath a bar or stuck with a weight in a
compromising position.
So, what's best?
There are advantages to both free weights and machines. No doubt, some
people will always prefer one over the other, and that's all right as long
as the favoritism is not born out of misconceptions or commercial bias.
Remember, the bottom line is that muscles do not respond one way with free
weights and another way with machines. To quote Dan Riley, the long-time
strength and conditioning coach of the Washington Redskins, "The equipment
used is not the key to maximum gains. It's how you use the equipment."
So, keep an open mind when it comes to selecting equipment for weight
training. If you don't have a preference, then vary workouts with free
weights and machines.
REFERENCES
1. Drowatzky, J.N., and F.C. Zuccato. Interrelationships between selected
measures of static and dynamic balance. Research Quarterly 38: 509-510,
1967.
2. Maglischo, E.W., C.W. Maglischo, D. Zier and T.R. Santos. The effect of
sprint-assisted and sprint-resisted swimming on stroke mechanics. Journal of
Swimming Research 1(2): 27-33, 1985.
3. Mannie, K. Barbells vs. machines: Balancing a weighty issue. Coach and
Athletic Director 67(7): 6-7, 1998.
4. Messier, S.P., and M. Dill. Alterations in strength and maximal oxygen
uptake consequent to Nautilus circuit weight training. Research Quarterly
for Exercise and Sport 56: 345-351, 1985.
5. Pipes, T.V. Variable resistance versus constant resistance strength
training in adult males. European Journal of Applied Physiology 39: 27-35,
1978.
6. Riley, D. Redskin conditioning. Washington Redskins: Ashburn, Va., 1996.
7. Thomas, J. Penn State football strength training. Penn State University:
University Park, Pa., 1998.
By Matt Brzcyki.
Baseball I
Basketball I
Cardio Respiratory Fitness
I
College Sports
Camps I
Diet and Sport I
FAFSA-Financial Aid Application
Fitness Training I
Fencing I
Field Hockey I
Football I
Golf
I
Gym Training I
Sports Helmets I
Hockey I
Lacrosse I
Lose Weight
NAIA
Conferences I
NCAA DI Conferences
I
NCAA DII
Conferences I
NCAA DIII Conferences I
NCAA Emerging Sports
NCAA Games Rosters
I
Quit Smoking I
Rowing I
Running I
Scholarship News I
Sports Shoes I
Soccer
I
Softball I
Sports Clothing
Sports Medicine I Sports Training I
Steroids I
Swimming I
Tennis I
Volleyball I
Weight Training I
Wrestling
©
College Sports Scholarships
Contact the
Webmaster
People who have a tendency to gain
weight during the winter often find that the extra stress imposed by
the holiday season, combined with extra exposure to high-calorie treats,
turns that tendency into a reality.
Seniors can improve their
health and lifestyle with exercise and a positive outlook.
A Grip on
Life, Swinging Towards My Dream By Giannina Gonzalez. Likewise many of
the virtues, values and lessons I learned in both golf and swimming have
folded into the events in my everyday life. |