|
|
fat burning exercises
is low-intensity exercise is more
beneficial for reducing body weight
It seems that the prevailing
notion in the fitness industry is that slower is better when it
comes to weight loss, or "fat burning." The misconception is that
low-intensity exercise is more beneficial for reducing body weight
and specifically body fat, since a higher percentage of fat is being
burned for fuel. While this may be an attractive hypothesis, there
is no documented evidence to support the contention that the type of
fuel (carbohydrate or fat) burned during exercise has any
preferential impact on the rate or amount of body fat loss.
Let's look at the facts. Your body utilizes primarily carbohydrates
(CHO) and fats for fuel during exercise. Proteins play a negligible
role, except during exhaustive exercise bouts. The intensity of
exercise and type of fuel being burned is reflected in what is
called the respiratory exchange ratio (RER), which varies between
.70 and 1.0. The lower the intensity of exercise, the lower the RER
value and the greater the percentage of fat being utilized (see
Table 1). Conversely, the greater the intensity, the higher the RER
and the greater the percentage of CHO being utilized. At low
exercise intensities, the body doesn't need to be very efficient
and, therefore, can take the time to mobilize free fatty acids from
the adipose tissue to be burned as fuel. At higher intensities, the
body must create energy very quickly and efficiently. Stored
carbohydrates (sugars) are better adapted to meet this need. While
the concept of keeping exercise intensity low in order to mobilize
and selectively burn a higher percentage of fat may sound logical,
the concept does not hold up mathematically and, more importantly,
has never been verified in the laboratory.
|
Home.
About Us.
FAQ's.
Timeline.
Tools.
$250 Essay
Competition.
Articles.
Clearinghouse.
College
Recruiting.
NCAA
Recruiting.
NCAA Sports
History.
Resources.
Sports History.
What do I send
to the coach.
How do I
contact the
coach.
|
| |
Data collected in the laboratory should help to illustrate this
point. In a study conducted at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, a
group of subjects walked on a treadmill for 30 minutes at a
self-selected, comfortable walking pace. Subjects walked at an average
of 3.8 mph (16 minutes/mile pace), burned approximately 8 kcal/min, and
their RER value was .88. From Table 1, we can see that they were
expending 59 percent of their calories from carbohydrates and 41 percent
of their calories from fat. When asked to run for 30 minutes at a
comfortable pace, subjects ran at an average of 6.5 mph (nine
minutes/mile pace) and expended approximately 15 kcal/min. Their RER
value averaged .93, they were expending 76 percent carbohydrates and 24
percent fat. Figure 1 illustrates the impact on total caloric
expenditure and substrate utilization. Not only did running result in a
greater total caloric expenditure, but also a slightly higher total
number of calories from fat in the same period of time.
The only reported study which has investigated the relationship between
exercise intensity and weight loss was conducted by Ballor and
colleagues and published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
(Volume 51, pp. 142-146, 1990). Twenty-seven obese females were randomly
assigned to either a low-intensity or high-intensity exercise group,
with both groups exercising three days per week for eight weeks. The
low-intensity group cycled at 50 percent V02max for 55 minutes per
session, while the high-intensity group cycled at 80 to 90 percent of
V02max for 25 minutes per session. It was found that both groups lost
approximately 12.5 pounds over the course of the study and had similar
reductions in lean body mass and fat weight, regardless of the intensity
of exercise. An additional finding was that only the high-intensity
group significantly improved their V02max as a result of training. |
The question is, then, does low-intensity exercise have a role?
Of course it does. But one must look at the goal of the exercise
program. If the goal is to improve overall health and reduce
cardiovascular mortality, any sort of activity is beneficial. The
recent recommendations published jointly by the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, the American College of Sports Medicine, and
the President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports recommend
that all Americans get at least 30 minutes of moderate-intensity
physical activity most days of the week. This equates to walking
approximately two miles per day, four to five days per week. If the
goal of the exercise program is specifically to lose weight, the aim
should be to maximize total energy expenditure. We have seen in our
example that this is best accomplished via higher-intensity work.
If this last statement is true, then why do most recommendations,
especially for the obese, center around utilizing low-intensity,
long-duration exercise to meet that end? The answer is twofold.
First, if we prescribed high-intensity exercise for overweight
and/or unfit people, a high percentage of them would become injured,
forcing them to drop out of the program. Second, we know that
adherence to high-intensity exercise is much lower than compliance
to low- or moderate-intensity exercise. If people don't perceive
exercise or activity to be fun, or at least tolerable, they're never
going to stay with it. This was the professional intent for
advocating low-intensity, long-duration exercise in the first place
-- to get people more active and to keep them active.
If weight loss is a major goal for an individual, the exercise
regimen that burns the greatest number of calories in the shortest
period of time should be what is prescribed. Determination of what
activity the person enjoys, as well as what they can orthopedically
and psychologically tolerate, are the main factors that should guide
the exercise prescription. Consideration of the specific fuel burned
during exercise should play no role in the exercise prescription
process. Until proven otherwise, when it comes to weight loss, a
calorie burned is a calorie burned, regardless of its source.
Baseball I
Basketball I
Bowling I
Cross Country I
Fencing I
Field Hockey I
Football I
Golf I
Gymnastics I
Ice
Hockey
Lacrosse I
Rowing I
Skiing I
Soccer I
Softball I
Swimming
I Tennis I
Track
and Field
Volleyball I
Water
Polo I Wrestling
© College
Sports Scholarships
Contact the Webmaster
Studies of large groups
support the relationship between
obesity and health risk,
it is hard to say how fat is too fat for any given individual.
After five to six minutes of continuous exercise, the majority of
energy the body requires has to be produced aerobically. The longer
the duration of exercise, the greater the
importance of the
aerobic system.
I thought carbohydrates were
the miracle food that gave you energy. Now it's protein. So what is
best, A high carbohydrate
diet or a high protein diet?
Many people enjoy vigorous
exercise but it needs to be noted that the amount and
intensity of exercise
required to produce stress-management benefits does not need to
be overwhelming.
Instead of worrying about a food's glycemic
index, keep an eye on portion sizes and consume carbohydrates
with foods that are high in fiber and protein, and with moderate
amounts of heart-healthy fats.
Since
weight-loss medications
have serious side-effects, are expensive and don't work in the long
run, why are they so popular?
|